#Gun facts liberas cannot accept how to#

‘ Junior varsity radical religious nuts ‘. There are those who deny truths based on inaccurate assumptions of biased opinions of people with agendas and there are those who deny truths by not observing the facts that present before their very eyes, these are the head in the sand crowd, that believe in an abstract so much they refuse to infuse the information that would contradict their positions. Just like they will never admit the truth about the founding fathers being Christian and our country being founded and grounded in Christianity and the principle truths of the Christian principles. This is the proverbial truth that can never be overcame, at least not until they find themselves clinging to the bottom of their desk while boots come nearer. As the antis like to say, it’s guns for everyone! Especially our “enemies.” Until and unless that occurs, the political divide on guns will continue, and the balance could tip in either direction.

#Gun facts liberas cannot accept how to#

If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a hundred times: the NRA and other pro-gun groups must reach out to minorities and other traditional Democratic voters and teach them how to keep and bear arms. There’s only way to change this pro-gun control Democratic dynamic: put guns into the hands of inner city Democrats. They’ve been brainwashed to believe that civilian gun ownership isn’t relevant to questions about the government’s power. Those Dems who do understand the concept of armed defense against government tyranny are over-educated. Or, for that matter, tyranny (even though they live under the soft version of same). Again, what have they got to lose?Īs for the convincing pro-gun control Dems that privately held firearms are a bulwark again tyranny, most big city Dems aren’t educated enough to know what a “bulwark” is. So Dems are quite happy to sacrifice your gun rights to see if gun control’s promise of less bad guys with guns pans out. Worse, all they see is bad guys using guns to threaten, wound and murder. In effect, they don’t have a right to keep and bear arms. Someone might get hurt!Īll of which means asking Democrats to oppose gun control is asking them to defend your right to keep and bear arms, not theirs. Owning a gun is simply not the done thing. For those Democrats in Blue State strongholds who can afford gun ownership, those who know how to jump over bureaucratic hurdles and pull powerful strings, the anti-gun gestalt runs rampant. It’s too expensive, too bureaucratic and/or illegal. How could they? In most Democrat strongholds, voters can’t keep and bear arms. Which is why big city Democrats have no interest in stories of defensive gun uses: they can’t identify. For the Democrats re: gun control? Nothing. As I said before, the facts of the matter don’t matter. Like all people, Democrats are listening to WII-FM (What’s In It For Me). It’s obvious who’s right (in both senses of the word). The vast majority of Republicans think gun control makes them less safe. The vast majority of Democrats think gun control makes them safer. So gun control! Because less guns means less crime! Like this: All they “know” is more guns = more crime. Thanks to racist gun control laws and cultural antipathy, these supporters have no practical experience legally and responsibly keeping and bearing firearms. With the disappearance of pro-gun Blue Dog Democrats, the Democratic Party has become dominated by left-leaning big city voters.